If technology doesn't work for people...it doesn't work!®

How to Select an Electronic Health Record System that Healthcare Professionals Can Use

February 5, 2009

by Robert M. Schumacher, Ph.D., Managing Director, User Centric, Inc.
Jayson M. Webb, Ph.D., Executive Director User Experience Research, User Centric, Inc.
Korey R. Johnson, M.S., User Experience Specialist, User Centric, Inc.

Abstract 

In recent years, Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have been promoted by industry and government as a means of improving patient care and controlling costs. However, actual adoption of EHRs has been lower than expected due to general resistance related to implementation costs, security, privacy, and systems integration. Recent studies have shown, however, that many of these adoption barriers pale in comparison to basic usability and productivity concerns. Simply put, healthcare professionals have found many EHRs too difficult to use.

Why has EHR usability remained an issue even as more organizations deploy these systems? To explore this topic, User Centric inspected dozens of publicly available Requests for Proposal and procurement guidelines for EHRs to learn how usability was addressed. This inspection revealed that EHR usability was overlooked or only marginally mentioned in nearly all of the documents. Only three documents discussed usability or user experience in any substantive way. Thus, there was a gap between the need for improved usability in EHRs and a lack of usability criteria in the EHR procurement cycle.

To bridge this gap, User Centric proposes an approach for specifying usability requirements and assessing EHR systems relative to these requirements. The User Centric white paper, "How to Select an Electronic Health Record System the Healthcare Professionals Can Use," identifies a five-step process for specifying and measuring the usability of EHR systems. These steps are intended to help guide selection of an EHR that meets the criteria for high levels of effectiveness, efficiency, and subjective satisfaction among healthcare providers. User Centric believes that EHR systems selected in this manner are more likely to be adopted, meet the needs of their users, and reduce the chance of usability-related abandonment.

Downloading the White Paper 

Click on the PDF link on the upper right hand side of the page to download the full version of the white paper. Registration required prior to white paper download.

Learn More

Visit our EHR User Experience Consulting section to learn how User Centric can help make your EHR implementation successful.

Contact Us for Answers

Send Message | +1.630.320.3900 | Contact Info

Comments

August 24, 2009 - 09:41 Anonymous said:

I think that the comments at the beginning on the reasons for slow adoption are right on. I think that poorly designed EMRs are partly the result of a lack of knowledge on the part of the developers and the physician users. The physician users ask for a product that is simple and the vendors deliver a product that is simplistic that is not fit for purpose in a complex environment.

Download this article in Adobe PDF for printing and offline viewing.

Requires Adobe Reader:Get Adobe Reader

Read about the Handbook of Global User Research

The Handbook of Global User Research collects insight from user experience professionals in over 20 countries. This book is a must-read for professionals working on global research projects. More Info

Drupal site hosting and development by SiteBasin and Alpha Cube, Inc.